Trial of summary offences in the Crown Court

21 November 2013

In R v Myers, 21 November 2013 (extempore), the Divisional Court (Pitchford LJ, Nicola Davies J) reiterated that there is no power to lay an information outside the six-month time-limit (section 127 MCA 1980).

The power discussed in the Scunthorpe Justices case is limited to cases where there is an amendment  to an existing information (section123 MCA 1980.) It also held that, on the facts, an offence of wasting police time did not constitute “the same misdoing” as an offence of perverting the course of justice.

The Applicant had faced an allegation of perverting the course of justice arising from a speeding offence. The prosecution alleged that he had gone to some lengths to cover-up the offence and to deceive the police. However, accepting his plea to an offence of wasting police time, it accepted that his wrongdoing was limited to not providing the police with sufficient information about the driver.

The prosecution purported to achieve this resolution by laying an information outside of the six-month time limit. The Applicant pleaded guilty. There was in fact an extant information alleging an offence under section 172 of the Road Traffic Act, but no application to amend was made. The information preferred was a fresh one.

The Applicant appealed to the Court of Appeal. However, because the judge had sat as a District Judge to hear the fresh information, the correct appeal route was to the Administrative Court. The Court of Appeal reconstituted itself accordingly. It accepted the Applicant’s argument that the error in his case was jurisdictional (as opposed to procedural). There had been no power to hear the information because it was out-of-time. The proceedings were a nullity and the conviction was quashed. The Court added that in its view the admitted misdoing was fundamentally different from the original allegation, such that applying Scunthorpe principles the result would likely have been the same.

The Applicant was represented by Garden Court North Chambers’ Matthew Stanbury, assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals.

Share this

Chambers news

Chambers news

GCN members join CBA colleagues in walkout action

Members of the Garden Court North Chambers criminal defence and appeals team yesterday joined colleagues at the criminal bar in the first day of walkout...

Chambers news

The “Bill of Rights” will strip away vital protections 

‘Positive obligations’ ensure that the state has a responsibility to protect us from harm. MPs remove these protections at their peril. This week, the Government...

Chambers news

GCN supports CBA days of action

Every member of the Garden Court North Chambers crime team fully endorses the result of the Criminal Bar Association ballot announced earlier this week. We...

Chambers news

A Fairer Private Rented Sector? – An Initial Appraisal

The Government has finally published its White Paper on reform of the private rented sector – A Fairer Private Rented Sector – the question mark...

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up