Judicial review challenge to revocation of Debt Relief Order

2 July 2013

R (Howard) v Official Receiver [2013] EWHC 1839 concerned a claim for judicial review of a decision by the Official Receiver (OR) to revoke a Debt Relief Order (DRO). Garden Court North Chambers’ Ben McCormack acted for the Claimant, instructed by Carol Moores of Oldham CAB.

A DRO was approved in respect of the Claimant. A few months later she received a back payment of working tax credits which took her over the monthly income threshold, and the OR decided to revoke the DRO. The Claimant, who is disabled, challenged that decision by way of judicial review, contending that the OR had made the decision no regard had been paid to section 149 Equality Act 2010 (the public sector equality duty). However, the High Court has ruled that when the OR revoked the DRO she was exercising a ‘judicial function’ and thus was not required to comply with section 149 due to the terms of paragraph 3 of Schedule 18 to the EA 2010.

Share this

Chambers news

Chambers news

GCN members join CBA colleagues in walkout action

Members of the Garden Court North Chambers criminal defence and appeals team yesterday joined colleagues at the criminal bar in the first day of walkout...

Chambers news

The “Bill of Rights” will strip away vital protections 

‘Positive obligations’ ensure that the state has a responsibility to protect us from harm. MPs remove these protections at their peril. This week, the Government...

Chambers news

GCN supports CBA days of action

Every member of the Garden Court North Chambers crime team fully endorses the result of the Criminal Bar Association ballot announced earlier this week. We...

Chambers news

A Fairer Private Rented Sector? – An Initial Appraisal

The Government has finally published its White Paper on reform of the private rented sector – A Fairer Private Rented Sector – the question mark...

Sign up to our mailing list

Our mailing list is dedicated to professionals with an interest in our work.

Sign up