News / High Court rules detention for indefinite sentence prison...


High Court rules detention for indefinite sentence prisoners post-tariff is "unlawful"  

31/07/2007

The High Court (Queen's Bench Division) has ruled today that the continued incarceration of prisoners serving indefinite sentences where the prisons do not have the facilities and courses required to assess their suitability for release was “arbitrary, unreasonable and unlawful”. (link to judgment included in article below).

David Walker v Secretary of State for The Home Department

and

Nicholas Wells v The Parole Board & The Secretary of State for Justice [2007] EWHC 1835 (QB)

Imprisonment for public protection (known as IPP), the scheme introduced by the then Home Secretary David Blunkett in 2005, has been considered by many as being ineffective and significantly contributing to prison overcrowding. Many prisoners have been given very short term indefinite sentences and at the expiry of their tariff have not had any opportunity to carry out the required coursework to assess their suitability for release. The system has been described as being “shambolic”.

In today's judgment, Lord Justice Laws said “to the extent that a prisoner remains incarcerated after tariff expiry without any current and effective assessment of the danger he does or does not pose, his detention cannot in reason be justified. It is therefore unlawful”.

However the government was granted a stay pending an urgent application for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal.

If the Court of Appeal upholds the judgment, the government could be faced with having to release thousands of prisoners serving short-term indefinite sentences once their tarrif has expired.

> download judgment .

Commentary by Erimnaz Mushtaq , member of Garden Court North Prison law team .

Media coverage

> Dangerous inmates may go free after court ruling on indefinite sentences - The Times (1/8/07)

> Inmates left in limbo by failures in new sentences - The Guardian (1/8/07)

> Prisons strategy in disarray after ruling – The Telegraph (31/7/07)

> Ministers face legal challenge over jails crisis - The Guardian (4/6/07)



Right menu

  What's New?  
 

10/9/14 Mikhil Karnik joins GCN immigration team

28/8/14 Supreme Court challenge to Cat A prisoner's refusal of oral hearing

28/8/14 No Mad Laws Campaign

13/8/14 3-judge Upper Tribunal panel critical of LAA failure to grant Legal Aid  

12/8/14 ECtHR ruling on prisoners votes

1/8/14 Clare Ashcroft on BBC Radio4 Woman's Hour

31/7/14 Murder conviction quashed at re-trial

30/7/14 Unlawful council tax reduction scheme judgment - implications for many low income council tax payers

22/7/14 Unlawful killing verdict in toddler inquest

21/7/14 "Bricks and mortar" interim accommodation

16/7/14 CART-type JR permission granted

16/7/14 Lucy Mair on Litigants in Person following legal aid cuts

10/7/14 Zimran Samuel expert evidence in Pakistan CG case

9/6/14 Vijay Jagadesham on students and veracity checks

19/5/14 Supreme Court hears IPP Article 5 challenge

24/4/14 GCN's Lucy Mair shortlisted for LALY award

24/4/14 David Campion awarded Master of Laws in Employment Law

28/3/2014 Angry GCN Members oppose CBA decision to discontinue protests against legal aid cuts

19/3/2014 Lucy Mair contributes to BHRC Report  

17/3/2014 Zimran Samuel contributes to BHRC report

12/3/14 Kerry Smith Returns from maternity

11/3/14 GCN Sponsor Legal Justice Together: Call for Action

03/3/14 Scott v Pacific Mortgages in Supreme Court

28/2/14 Tom Royston on Bedroom Tax

20/2/14 Police Call Handler Unanimously Acquitted of Misconduct

02/01/2014 Criminal Barristers National Protest

19/12/2013 Breach of PSED in the provision of women’s approved premises  

12/12/13  Richard Brigden acting for anti fracking protesters   

3/12/2013 MoJ VHCC list clarification

28/11/2013 Employment status of a CoE priest

19/11/13 Leicester City Council v Shearer

 > Go to News headlines

Privacy Policy