News / Admitting "bad character" evidence: Further gui...


Admitting "bad character" evidence: Further guidance on summing-up  

22/07/2005

R v Edwards (2005) 149 S.J. 835, C.A. (29/06/2005). Farrhat Arshad provides a summary of this recently reported case where Lord Jusitice Rose gave further guidance on what a summing-up should contain further to the gudiance at paragraph 18 of Hanson.

R v Edwards (2005) 149 S.J. 835, C.A. (29/06/2005)

This case, along with three others (R v Fysh; R v Duggan; R v Chohan) were listed and heard together as they provided further examples to add to those previously considered by the Court of Appeal in R v Hanson & Ors [2005] EWCA Crim 824 and R v Bovell & Dowds [2005] EWCA Crim 1091 of the admissibility of bad character under sections 98 to 113 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.

In his ruling, before giving consideration to each of the individual cases, Lord Justice Rose gave further guidance on what a summing-up should contain further to paragraph 18 of Hanson. He noted that the guidance in Hanson was not intended to provide a blueprint whereby departure from which would result in the quashing of a conviction.

Rather, he went on to clarify, what the summing-up must contain is : (i) a clear warning to the jury against placing undue reliance on previous convictions, which cannot, by themselves, prove guilt; and (ii) an explanation as to why the jury has heard the evidence and the ways in which it is relevant to and may help their decision, bearing in mind that relevance will depend primarily, though not always exclusively, on the gateway in section 101(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, through which the evidence has been admitted. He provided an example where evidence admitted through gateway (g), because of an attack on another person's character, may be relevant or irrelevant to propensity, so as to require a direction on this aspect.

He concluded that provided the judge gives such a clear warning, explanation and guidance as to use, the terms in which he or she does so can properly differ. Thus, there is no rigid formula to be adhered to.

Farrhat Arshad appeared for Edwards, instructed by Robert Lizars Solicitors .

.....................................................................................................................................

Useful links

> click here to go to our seminar archive to download the paper on "The Bad Character Provisions of the CJA" (updated September 2005).

> click here for more information about our Crime Team

> click here to go to our Criminal Law Updates page



Right menu

  What's New?  
 

21/11/11 European citizenship

18/11/11 Surveillance laws

16/11/11 Prison distance learning policy unlawful (HMP Wakefield)

11/11/11 L'pool 'Bloody Sunday'

3/11/11 Mark George QC called to Bar of Northern Ireland

28/10/11 Indirect discrimination

26/10/11 Chambers UK 2012

21/10/11 Philip McLeish joins

18/10/11 Squatting reform

18/10/11 Riot appeals

13/10/11 AXA asbestos appeal

12/10/11 New Ogden Tables

10/10/11 Sarah Daley nomination

6/10/11 Supergrass evidence

3/10/11 Parole: "mistake of fact"

29/8/11 Manuel Valle execution

28/9/11 Teacher cleared (Wilson)

22/9/11 Legal 500 2011

21/9/11 Manchester Legal Walk

4/8/11 Learning disability in prison

3/8/11 Criminal law update

2/8/11 Sara Woodhouse Davie

22/7/11 Murder of burglar (ITV)

21/7/11 Trafficking offences

12/7/11 Joint enterprise

4/7/11 Prison law bulletin

30/6/11 3rd party race discrim

21/6/11 LASPO Bill

16/6/11 Facebook juror

14/6/11 Sex Offenders register

31/5/11 Retention of DNA

26/5/11 Fasting prisoner, Art 9

23/5/11 Sentence Calculation

19/5/11 Lawful containment

12/5/11 Compensation for miscarriages of justice

5/5/11 Vulnerable witnesses

3/5/11 PAS Guardian article

20/4/11 Proportionate recall

31/3/11 Makisi (Homelessness)

29/3/11 Teacher arrest unlawful

29/3/11 Mark Barlow (Radio 4)

28/3/11 Fresh Claims

17/3/11 Hearsay (Confiscation)

3/3/11 Sex Offenders Register

Feb 2011 Housing bulletin

22/2/11 Death Penalty training

14/2/11 Bahrain: BHRC report

11/2/11 Damages: Art 5(1)

8/2/11 Litigants in person

3/2/11 Theft of illegal property?

1/2/11 EHRC Preferred Counsel

26/1/11 Jared Ficklin joins

24/1/11 FNP recategorisation

20/1/11 Art 6(1) and disclosure

7/1/11 Mark Barlow in Rook & Ward on Sexual Offences (4th)

4/1/11 Osborn & Booth

Immigration Law & Practice (8th)

9/12/10 Reverse burden of proof

30/11/10 Whole-life tariff

25/11/10 Prisoner voting

23/11/10 Death at HMP Wymott

23/11/10 Sexual orientation

3/11/10 Pinnock judgment

28/10/10 Raymond Morris

27/10/10 Arizona execution

27/10/10 Matthew Stanbury called to Bar of Northern Ireland

25/10/10 Immigration detention for mentally ill (Anam)

22/10/10 Disab.Eq.Duty (Pieretti)

1/10/10 Equality Act 2010

9/9/10 Succession provisions

Sep 2010 Immigration Bulletin

16/8/10 Cat A (Krstic)

26/7/10 Crossfire shooting

23/7/10 HM (Malawi)

30/6/10 Noone and HDC

23/6/10 Out-of-time appeal IPP

7/6/10 Rape anonymity

18/5/10 US Supreme Court outlaws life without parole for non-homicide juveniles

30/4/10 Whole life tariff quashed

19/4/10 Hannah McIntyre

25/2/10 Assisted suicide

16/12/09 Third party support

16/12/09 Sonny Lodge inquiry

5/12/09 2004 conviction unsafe

30/11/09 IPP transfer- Guittard

9/10/09 BVT: LAG article

2/10/09 "Letter from America"

9/9/09 Michael Shields released

8/7/09 COPD compensation

16/6/09 Murder quashed

22/4/09 Mc'r Admin Court

30/3/09 New QC

12/11/08 Pro-bono hero

23/10/08 "Small but beautiful"

17/9/08 Historic allegations

9/9/08 Dog "Rocky" not guilty

4/7/08 Posthumous appeal

14/3/08 Police on juries?

24/2/08 LCN DNA: Unreliable?

22/11/07 Mesothelioma ruling

12/04/06 Oral sex in public

> Go to News headlines

Privacy Policy