News / Will Assange Decision Open Doors for Extradition Challenges?


Will Assange Decision Open Doors for Extradition Challenges?  

24/11/2011

Julian Assange has failed in his appeal against extradition to Sweden where he faces questioning for alleged non-consensual sex. In its ruling, the High Court effectively offers a new exception to the general principle of mutual recognition on which the European Arrest Warrant is based. Pete Weatherby of GCN was interviewed for Lexis Nexis Current Awareness (published 21/11/11) about the ruling and its implications.

Extracts from the article as follows:

As Pete Weatherby explains: “The High Court held that the term ‘judicial authority’ does cover prosecutors in some member states. This is correct as a matter of fact, and as the Extradition Act 2003 borrows the term directly from the Framework Direction it is plain that Parliament intended that the same definition is meant to pertain to domestic law. The key point is that the requesting authority is not acting as part of the legislative or executive branches of the State. Although prosecutors are not usually ‘judicial’ officers and are sometimes properly to be considered part of the executive, their necessary independence puts them in a different position.”

...

“It is rather unclear how far this judgment actually opens the door to more challenges to extradition. At [17] the Court refers to maintaining public confidence in the system of mutual recognition of judicial decisions by requiring the extradition courts to scrutinise the request with an intensity determined by the circumstances of the case, and at [19] the Court suggests that decisions of prosecutors rather than judges will attract more anxious scrutiny.

“The latter is clear, but how can the executing State apply greater scrutiny to some cases rather than others unless there is some properly grounded abuse point?” He says the EAW system does not allow the executing court to go behind the judicial decision of the requesting State. “This,” adds Weatherby, “is the real problem and one which Sir Scott Baker did not seem to question in his recent review of extradition provisions, so it is unlikely to change any time soon.

Quick links

> The full article can be found on under Current Awareness on the Lexis Nexis network (subscription only) ref: LNB News 21/11/2011 51 "Will Assange Decision Open Doors for Extradition Challenges?". Click here to sign in if you have an account.



Right menu

  What's New?  
 

Save UK Justice resources
Links to briefing papers
Template MP letters 

Latest GCN legal bulletins
Housing (Mar 2013)
Crime (Mar 2013)

LASPO resources
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 Part 3 (re: crime)
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 for Housing Law
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 for Immigration Law

Now on Twitter @gcnchambers

22/5/13 Damages for detention breaching Art 5(1) (Stickley v MOJ from 2011) transcript added

21/5/13 Mark Barlow on sex offences, moral panic and right to fair trial

16/5/13 Matt Stanbury on dangerous dogs, anti-social behaviour and miscarriages

15/5/13 Sarah Daley shortlisted for LALY 2013 awards

7/5/13 Sarah Daley on concerns over immigration JR curbs

2/5/13 Hillsborough inquests to be held in North West

23/4/13 Anne Williams (1953-2013)

17/4/13 Hillsborough: legal team call for witnesses

15/4/13 Osborn & Booth (Parole Board oral hearings) in Supreme Court this week

27/3/13 Criminal Law Update

25/3/13 2013 applications for 2014 pupillage

15/3/13 Accept Track Changes? (Housing bulletin)

12/3/13 Matt Stanbury on how long do sex offenders have to notify on release

5/3/13 Tom Royston on Universal Credit 

21/2/13 Pete Weatherby QC on jury trials / Vicky Pryce

14/2/13 IPP sentences - ECHR ruling stands as Grand Chamber rejects Government's application to appeal (James Wells & Lee)

12/2/13 Good qn? Some thoughts on expert evidence within injunction proceedings

6/3/13 Brigid Baillie on Gangbos two years on (Justice Gap)

4/2/13 Mark Barlow on Challenging Convictions for Historical Sexual Offences

1/2/13 GCN pupil Tom Royston at "Legal Advice in crisis" conference (M'cr) on 9/2/13

31/1/13 New Standard Contractual Terms

25/1/13 Ian Lawless miscarriage compensation test case succeeds

25/1/13 Ben McCormack on Public Sector Equality Duty

22/1/13 Mark George QC in "Miscarriages of justice and jury trials" debate at KCL London

3/1/13 Passionate about justice

3/1/13 Mark George QC on the new Hillsborough inquests

19/12/12 Hillsborough inquest verdicts quashed in High Court

19/12/12 Social media prosecution guidelines

18/12/12 Criminal Law update

10/12/12 New Sex Offenders Notification regime challenge

28/11/12 ECHR Grand Chamber: Vinter v UK (whole life, Art 3) - Pete Weatherby QC

28/11/12 Twitter and contempt

23/11/12 JR clampdown

15/11/12 Life sentence quashed for hospital order

13/11/12 Permission to appeal JR refusal (eviction)

Human Trafficking and the Law

5/11/12 Mark George QC death penalty lectures (Amicus)

2/11/12 NEW! Chambers & Partners 2013 rankings

31/10/12 Mark George QC: SYorks Police "out of control"

22/10/12 Orgreave miners and South Yorkshire Police (BBC)

18/10/12 Blogger ASBO quashed

4/10/12 "A Kafkaesque nightmare"

3/10/12 Extradition: fitness to plead

18/9/12 ECHR rules on IPPs

14/9/12 Criminalise squatting?

13/9/12 Hillsborough report

5/9/12 Sex offender notification

16/8/12 Assange extradition

16/8/12 Matt Stanbury / Ben McCormack audio recording of PLP JR North 2012 plenary

15/8/12 Admissibility of hearsay

18/7/12 Family immigration rules

11/7/12 David Campion joins

28/6/12 Fresh gynaecological evidence (S & Ors v R)

27/6/12 Wrongly accused

26/6/12 Juvenille murder in US

22/6/12 Talha Ahsan

13/6/12 Rape conviction quashed (Court of Appeal NI)

13/6/12 Dangerous dogs

23/5/12 Cautions, coppers & cons

18/5/12 Equal pay

18/5/12 "Justice on the cheap"

14/5/12 Sharing JR

14/5/12 Why we do what we do

9/5/12 Mullings-Sewell inquest

8/5/12 F.A.C.T

23/4/12 Brighton Declaration

19/4/12 Belfast H-Rights event

18/4/12 ECHR reform (BBC)

12/4/12 Mark George QC - Visiting practitioner at Centre for American Legal Studies

11/4/12 Abu Hamza (BBC)

2/4/12 New QC

29/3/12 What is an IPP

8/3/12 Trafficking legal f/work

1/2/12 NEPB CoA latest

27/1/12 Death by incarceration

19/1/12 Loss of control

5/1/12 Double jeopardy

23/12/11 "Sickie" juror

20/12/11 Police on jury

14/12/11 Joint enterprise

9/12/11 UKBA "unfair" and "obscure" decisions quashed

5/12/11 2005 IPP quashed

18/11/11 Surveillance laws

16/11/11 Distance learning policy unlawful (HMP Wakefield)

28/10/11 Indirect discrimination

18/10/11 Squatting reform

18/10/11 Riot appeals

12/10/11 New Ogden Tables

6/10/11 Supergrass evidence

3/10/11 PB "mistake of fact"

28/9/11 Teacher cleared

4/8/11 Learning disability

22/7/11 Murder of burglar (ITV)

21/7/11 Trafficking offences

16/6/11 Facebook juror

26/5/11 Fasting prisoner, Art 9

29/3/11 Teacher arrest unlawful

3/3/11 Sex Offenders Register

14/2/11 Bahrain: BHRC report

8/2/11 Litigants in person

1/2/11 EHRC Preferred Counsel

7/1/11 Mark Barlow in Rook & Ward on Sexual Offences (4th)

4/1/11 Osborn & Booth

Macdonald's Immigration Law & Practice (8th ed.)

23/11/10 Sexual orientation

3/11/10 Pinnock judgment

19/4/10 Hannah McIntyre

16/12/09 Third party support

16/12/09 Sonny Lodge inquiry

30/11/09 IPP transfer- Guittard

9/9/09 Michael Shields released

16/6/09 Murder quashed

12/11/08 Pro-bono hero

23/10/08 "Small but beautiful"

9/9/08 Dog "Rocky" not guilty

4/7/08 Posthumous appeal

22/11/07 Mesothelioma ruling

12/04/06 Oral sex in public

 > Go to News headlines

Privacy Policy