News / Right to review reviewed


Right to review reviewed  

16/08/2009

In a recent case it was ruled that forcing convicted sex offenders to remain on the sex offenders register was a breach of their human rights. In an interview for Lexis Nexis Butterworths News (published 13/8/09) Gavin Jones spoke to Pete Weatherby , barrister at Garden Court North Chambers.

The case (JF & Anor,R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 792) concerned whether the defendant, a convicted sex offender, had a right to review being enforced to remain on the register for the rest of their lives.

Extracts from the article as follows:

Initially commenting on the judgment Weatherby states: “The effect of the ruling is to prompt Parliament to rectify this anomaly. What’s controversial about the ruling is that reviews will allow judgments to be made as to whether or not previously-convicted offenders will re-offend at a future point in their lives...It is likely that there will be a minimum time to elapse before application can be made for the notification requirements to be set aside, and the onus will be on the offender to prove he is no longer a risk. Proving a negative is obviously difficult. However, the SoS’s [secretary of state] own evidence (a substantial amount was disclosed in the course of this case) and the claimant’s evidence concurred that after a period of time (perhaps 15 years) the statistical risk of an un-reconvicted sex offender being convicted of another sex offence is about the same as for the general population.”

Pete Weatherby also comments on whether the Sexual Ofences Act 2003, s82 has been successful in re-offense prevention, on international precedents for rights to review in such cases, and on the subject of sexual offenders re-offending as compared to other crimes he adds:

"In fact intra-familial sex offenders rarely re-offend; so the real problem is first-time offenders (unlike other areas of criminal law; burglars re-offend at the rate of about 75 per cent within two years of release from custody). Sex offenders in general have a markedly lower rate of re-offending than other crimes, and I have seen no evidence that the rate of sexual offending or re-offending has decreased since 1997. The notification requirements must also impose a considerable burden on police resources.”

Quick links

> The full article can be found on under Current Awareness on the Lexis Nexis Butterworths network (subscription only) ref: LNB News 13/08/2009 27 "The Right to Review Reviewed". Click here to sign in if you have an account.

> 23/7/09 - Court of Appeal upholds sex offender register ruling



Right menu

  What's New?  
 

21/11/11 European citizenship

18/11/11 Surveillance laws

16/11/11 Prison distance learning policy unlawful (HMP Wakefield)

11/11/11 L'pool 'Bloody Sunday'

3/11/11 Mark George QC called to Bar of Northern Ireland

28/10/11 Indirect discrimination

26/10/11 Chambers UK 2012

21/10/11 Philip McLeish joins

18/10/11 Squatting reform

18/10/11 Riot appeals

13/10/11 AXA asbestos appeal

12/10/11 New Ogden Tables

10/10/11 Sarah Daley nomination

6/10/11 Supergrass evidence

3/10/11 Parole: "mistake of fact"

29/8/11 Manuel Valle execution

28/9/11 Teacher cleared (Wilson)

22/9/11 Legal 500 2011

21/9/11 Manchester Legal Walk

4/8/11 Learning disability in prison

3/8/11 Criminal law update

2/8/11 Sara Woodhouse Davie

22/7/11 Murder of burglar (ITV)

21/7/11 Trafficking offences

12/7/11 Joint enterprise

4/7/11 Prison law bulletin

30/6/11 3rd party race discrim

21/6/11 LASPO Bill

16/6/11 Facebook juror

14/6/11 Sex Offenders register

31/5/11 Retention of DNA

26/5/11 Fasting prisoner, Art 9

23/5/11 Sentence Calculation

19/5/11 Lawful containment

12/5/11 Compensation for miscarriages of justice

5/5/11 Vulnerable witnesses

3/5/11 PAS Guardian article

20/4/11 Proportionate recall

31/3/11 Makisi (Homelessness)

29/3/11 Teacher arrest unlawful

29/3/11 Mark Barlow (Radio 4)

28/3/11 Fresh Claims

17/3/11 Hearsay (Confiscation)

3/3/11 Sex Offenders Register

Feb 2011 Housing bulletin

22/2/11 Death Penalty training

14/2/11 Bahrain: BHRC report

11/2/11 Damages: Art 5(1)

8/2/11 Litigants in person

3/2/11 Theft of illegal property?

1/2/11 EHRC Preferred Counsel

26/1/11 Jared Ficklin joins

24/1/11 FNP recategorisation

20/1/11 Art 6(1) and disclosure

7/1/11 Mark Barlow in Rook & Ward on Sexual Offences (4th)

4/1/11 Osborn & Booth

Immigration Law & Practice (8th)

9/12/10 Reverse burden of proof

30/11/10 Whole-life tariff

25/11/10 Prisoner voting

23/11/10 Death at HMP Wymott

23/11/10 Sexual orientation

3/11/10 Pinnock judgment

28/10/10 Raymond Morris

27/10/10 Arizona execution

27/10/10 Matthew Stanbury called to Bar of Northern Ireland

25/10/10 Immigration detention for mentally ill (Anam)

22/10/10 Disab.Eq.Duty (Pieretti)

1/10/10 Equality Act 2010

9/9/10 Succession provisions

Sep 2010 Immigration Bulletin

16/8/10 Cat A (Krstic)

26/7/10 Crossfire shooting

23/7/10 HM (Malawi)

30/6/10 Noone and HDC

23/6/10 Out-of-time appeal IPP

7/6/10 Rape anonymity

18/5/10 US Supreme Court outlaws life without parole for non-homicide juveniles

30/4/10 Whole life tariff quashed

19/4/10 Hannah McIntyre

25/2/10 Assisted suicide

16/12/09 Third party support

16/12/09 Sonny Lodge inquiry

5/12/09 2004 conviction unsafe

30/11/09 IPP transfer- Guittard

9/10/09 BVT: LAG article

2/10/09 "Letter from America"

9/9/09 Michael Shields released

8/7/09 COPD compensation

16/6/09 Murder quashed

22/4/09 Mc'r Admin Court

30/3/09 New QC

12/11/08 Pro-bono hero

23/10/08 "Small but beautiful"

17/9/08 Historic allegations

9/9/08 Dog "Rocky" not guilty

4/7/08 Posthumous appeal

14/3/08 Police on juries?

24/2/08 LCN DNA: Unreliable?

22/11/07 Mesothelioma ruling

12/04/06 Oral sex in public

> Go to News headlines