News / Murder conviction quashed in crossfire shooting appeal


Murder conviction quashed in crossfire shooting appeal  

26/07/2010

The Court of Appeal today handed down final judgement in R v Armel Gnango. In quashing his conviction for murder, the Court overturned the trial judge’s ruling that Gnango could be guilty of the murder of an innocent bystander by a shot fired by a male who was attempting to kill the appellant; a ruling that the appellant had argued would have constituted a significant and unacceptable extension of the principles of joint enterprise.

Gnango, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1691; [2010] WLR (D) 201 (26 July 2010)

> judgment

On 14th December 2009, 5 Court of Appeal judges heard an appeal on behalf of Armel Gnango against his conviction for murder in May 2008. The judgement, to which all 5 contributed, was handed down by Thomas LJ on 15th July 2010.

At the appellant’s trial before Cooke J and a jury at the Central Criminal Court in 2008, he had been convicted of the murder of Magda Pniewska, a Polish nurse who had received a fatal gunshot wound whilst walking home from work through a residential housing estate in South East London. The appellant was found by the jury to have engaged in a ‘shoot-out’ with another man (known as “bandana man” because of his attempted disguise). The Appellant was convicted of the attempted murder of Bandana Man and this conviction was not appealed. The two shooters had exchanged gunfire across a large car park through which the victim was walking at the time. She was killed by a single shot, accepted by the prosecution to have been fired from the gun of “Bandana man” whilst he was trying to shoot the appellant. Bandana Man was clearly guilty of her murder according to the established principles of transferred malice. Both Bandana Man and the appellant were also guilty of attempting to murder the other (Crime A).

The trial judge had rejected submissions that the appellant could not be guilty of Ms. Pniewska’s murder. He had ruled that the appellant’s act of firing rendered him guilty of the offence of affray (Crime B) albeit not indicted. The fact that he committed Crime B whilst also harbouring an intention to kill meant that the appellant could be fixed with liability for the death, as participation in Crime B was sufficient to constitute a joint enterprise between the two shooters fixing both with liability for the foreseen consequences of Crime A.

The Court of Appeal disagreed. Liability cannot exist without a joint enterprise to commit crime A (i.e. the attempted murder of the other). The appellant could not be party to a joint enterprise to attempt to kill himself and could not, therefore, be held liable for the foreseen act of bandana man.

Nina Grahame of GCN, led by Sallie Bennett-Jenkins QC, appeared for the appellant, originally instructed by Mackesys Solicitors , London.

Quick links

> 13/8/10 - Joint Enterprise - Foresight of Risk of Harm to Another Insufficient for Murder ( Mark George QC of GCN was interviewed about the questions this case raises for an article published on LexisNexis Current Awareness)



Right menu

  What's New?  
 

Save UK Justice resources
- what's it all about?
- Consultation responses 

Latest GCN legal bulletins
Housing Team Bulletin (Feb 2014)
Crime (December 2013)

LASPO resources
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 Part 3 (re: crime)
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 for Housing Law
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 for Immigration Law

Now on Twitter @gcnchambers  

GCN "Future of Immigration Law" conference 1.5.14, M'cr, 5.5CPD BOOK NOW

GCN housing seminars on CPR Update (7.5.14) and Homelessness (20.5.14)

28/03/2014 Angry GCN Members oppose CBA decision to discontinue protests against legal aid cuts

19/3/2014 Lucy Mair contributes to BHRC Report on Torture and Sexual Violence in Sri Lanka   

17/3/2014 Zimran Samuel contributes to BHRC report on human rights inquiry into Violence Against Woman and Girls 

12/3/14 Kerry Smith Returns from maternity leave 5th May

11/3/14 Garden Court North Sponsor Legal Justice Together: Call for Action Conference

03/3/14 Scott v Pacific Mortgages and Others in Supreme Court

28/2/14 Tom Royston on Bedroom Tax: Update and Winning Bedroom Tax Cases

20/2/14 Police Call Handler Unanimously Acquitted of Misconduct in Public Office

02/01/2014 Criminal Barristers National Protest

19/12/2013 Breach of PSED in the provision of women’s approved premises  

18/12/2013 GCN Chambers welcomes vote of no confidence in Law Society leadership in Legal Aid fight 

12/12/13  Richard Brigden acting for anti drilling protesters  

3/12/2013 MoJ VHCC list clarification 

28/11/2013 David Campion - Judgment in EAT case on employment status of a CoE priest handed down

21/11/13 Matthew Stanbury- Divisional Court reiterate that there is no power to lay an information outside the six-month time-limit

19/11/13 Phillip McLeish - Judgment in Leicester City Council v Shearer