News / M1 widening protest prosecution dismissed at Sheffield Cr...


M1 widening protest prosecution dismissed at Sheffield Crown Court  

30/04/2008

A prosecution for conspiracy to commit a public nuisance brought against seven protesters was dismissed at Sheffield Crown Court today. (R v White & Others, Sheffield Crown Court, 30th April 2008).

The defendants were stopped by police on a public highway near the site of road works being carried out to widen the M1 between junction 31 and 32 in South Yorkshire on 16th April last year. Following a search of their vehicle the police recovered three anti road-widening banners and three bicycle D locks. The prosecution case was that the defendants had agreed to suspend the banners from a motorway bridge and/or to lock themselves onto machinery, and that the effect of such a protest would have been to endanger the safety of road users or to necessitate closure of the M1. No such protest had in fact taken place.

Granting a defence application to dismiss the charge, HHJ Robinson found that in order to obtain a conviction the prosecution would have had to prove that the defendants had agreed to do something which would either endanger life or prevent the public from using the M1. He rejected the prosecution argument that the display of banners on a motorway bridge or persons locking themselves on to machinery could endanger life by distracting drivers, and noted that although there was evidence that the closure of the M1 might be considered by the police if a ‘locking-on’ protest were to take place, this would be as a result of police intervention rather than a direct consequence of the ‘lock-on’.

In any event, since the defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit a public nuisance, the prosecution had to prove that the defendants either intended or knew that either danger to life or the closure of the M1 would be the consequence of the action they agreed upon. The judge ruled that even if the prosecution could establish that there was an agreement for the defendants to display banners or lock themselves onto machinery, there was ‘not a jot of evidence’ to suggest that they intended or knew that their actions would cause either danger to life or the closure of the motorway. On the evidence ‘it would involve unacceptable speculation’ to conclude that the defendants intended anything other than ‘a peaceful protest at ground level’.

As a result of the ruling all the defendants were discharged.

The defendants Brereton, Clements and Minns were represented by Mark George , Andy Fitzpatrick and Kate Stone , instructed by Kieran Clarke solicitors, Chesterfield and the defendant Chiat was represented by Pete Weatherby instructed by Bindmans solicitors , London.

Commentary by Kate Stone

Quick links

> 1/5/08 - M1 protest plot case is dropped (Sheffield Telegraph / The Star)



Right menu

  What's New?  
 

#Iamforjustice/ #saveukjustice

Law Society / LAPG / LAG Legal Aid Still Available Leaflet

Now on Twitter @gcnchambers  

4/3/15 Joe Markus appointed to Equality and Human Rights Commission Panel of Counsel

26/2/15  S222 injunction to restrain begging in Leeds City Centre discharged by High Court

23/2/15 Prisoner adjudication decision quashed

16/2/15 Extension of Workers Registration Scheme was unlawful; EU workers

13/2/15 Rory O'Ryan appointed as Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge

5/2/15 Zimran Samuel contributes to "Now That You Know Say NO To FGM" short film

27/1/15 Permission granted in homelessness affordability appeal

26/1/15 CCMS Resources page

19/1/15 Victor Nealon - refusal of compensation for miscarriage of justice

13/1/15 Kate Stone on Human Rights and Arms Trade Treaty

5/1/15 GCN move to Blackfriars House profiled in M.E.N

15/12/14 Gudanaviciene (exceptional funding)  

10/12/14 Pete Weatherby QC and Vijay Jagadesham in Landmark Supreme Court decision on ISP Prisoners

5/12/14 UT decision on Bereavement Benefits and telephone marriage

24/11/14 Natalie Wilkins "New immigration tribunal procedure rules" (Free Movement blog)

13/11/14 Permission to appeal granted in benefits case

12/11/14 Joseph Markus and Natalie Wilkins join chambers

11/11/14 Successful exceptional funding application

3/11/14 Chambers UK 2015 recommends GCN in Band 1  

28/10/14 Inquest finds failures in prison mental health services 

21/10/14 David Campion on JR of Employment Tribunal fees

10/10/14 Pete Weatherby QC wins Legal 500 Regional Silk Award 2014

9/10/14 Zimran Samuel wins Family Law Junior Barrister of the Year 2014

3/10/14 Clerks "first class" in Legal 500 2014

26/9/14 Legal Aid, Labour and a 'manifesto for hope'

10/9/14 Mikhil Karnik joins GCN immigration team

28/8/14 Supreme Court challenge to Cat A prisoner's refusal of oral hearing

28/8/14 No Mad Laws Campaign

13/8/14 3-judge Upper Tribunal panel critical of LAA  

12/8/14 ECtHR ruling on prisoners votes

1/8/14 Clare Ashcroft on BBC Radio4 Woman's Hour

31/7/14 Murder conviction quashed at re-trial

30/7/14 Unlawful council tax reduction scheme 

22/7/14 Unlawful killing verdict in toddler inquest

21/7/14 "Bricks and mortar" interim accommodation

16/7/14 CART-type JR permission granted

16/7/14 Lucy Mair on Litigants in Person following legal aid cuts

10/7/14 Zimran Samuel expert evidence in Pakistan CG case

9/6/14 Vijay Jagadesham on students and veracity checks

24/4/14 GCN's Lucy Mair shortlisted for LALY award

24/4/14 David Campion awarded Master of Laws in Employment Law

28/3/14 Angry GCN Members oppose CBA decision to discontinue protests against legal aid cuts

19/3/14 Lucy Mair contributes to BHRC Report  

17/3/14 Zimran Samuel contributes to BHRC report

11/3/14 GCN Sponsor Legal Justice Together: Call for Action

03/3/14 Scott v Pacific Mortgages in Supreme Court

28/2/14 Tom Royston on Bedroom Tax

20/2/14 Police Call Handler Unanimously Acquitted of Misconduct

19/12/13 Breach of PSED in the provision of women’s approved premises  

12/12/13  Richard Brigden acting for anti fracking protesters   

3/12/13 MoJ VHCC list clarification

28/11/13 Employment status of a CoE priest

19/11/13 Leicester City Council v Shearer

 > Go to News headlines

Privacy Policy