News / M1 widening protest prosecution dismissed at Sheffield Cr...


M1 widening protest prosecution dismissed at Sheffield Crown Court  

30/04/2008

A prosecution for conspiracy to commit a public nuisance brought against seven protesters was dismissed at Sheffield Crown Court today. (R v White & Others, Sheffield Crown Court, 30th April 2008).

The defendants were stopped by police on a public highway near the site of road works being carried out to widen the M1 between junction 31 and 32 in South Yorkshire on 16th April last year. Following a search of their vehicle the police recovered three anti road-widening banners and three bicycle D locks. The prosecution case was that the defendants had agreed to suspend the banners from a motorway bridge and/or to lock themselves onto machinery, and that the effect of such a protest would have been to endanger the safety of road users or to necessitate closure of the M1. No such protest had in fact taken place.

Granting a defence application to dismiss the charge, HHJ Robinson found that in order to obtain a conviction the prosecution would have had to prove that the defendants had agreed to do something which would either endanger life or prevent the public from using the M1. He rejected the prosecution argument that the display of banners on a motorway bridge or persons locking themselves on to machinery could endanger life by distracting drivers, and noted that although there was evidence that the closure of the M1 might be considered by the police if a ‘locking-on’ protest were to take place, this would be as a result of police intervention rather than a direct consequence of the ‘lock-on’.

In any event, since the defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit a public nuisance, the prosecution had to prove that the defendants either intended or knew that either danger to life or the closure of the M1 would be the consequence of the action they agreed upon. The judge ruled that even if the prosecution could establish that there was an agreement for the defendants to display banners or lock themselves onto machinery, there was ‘not a jot of evidence’ to suggest that they intended or knew that their actions would cause either danger to life or the closure of the motorway. On the evidence ‘it would involve unacceptable speculation’ to conclude that the defendants intended anything other than ‘a peaceful protest at ground level’.

As a result of the ruling all the defendants were discharged.

The defendants Brereton, Clements and Minns were represented by Mark George , Andy Fitzpatrick and Kate Stone , instructed by Kieran Clarke solicitors, Chesterfield and the defendant Chiat was represented by Pete Weatherby instructed by Bindmans solicitors , London.

Commentary by Kate Stone

Quick links

> 1/5/08 - M1 protest plot case is dropped (Sheffield Telegraph / The Star)



Right menu

  What's New?  
 

Save UK Justice resources
- what's it all about?
- Consultation responses 

Latest GCN legal bulletins
Housing Team Bulletin (Feb 2014)
Crime (December 2013)

LASPO resources
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 Part 3 (re: crime)
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 for Housing Law
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 for Immigration Law

Now on Twitter @gcnchambers  

GCN "Future of Immigration Law" conference 1.5.14, M'cr, 5.5CPD BOOK NOW

GCN housing seminars on CPR Update (7.5.14) and Homelessness (20.5.14)

28/03/2014 Angry GCN Members oppose CBA decision to discontinue protests against legal aid cuts

19/3/2014 Lucy Mair contributes to BHRC Report on Torture and Sexual Violence in Sri Lanka   

17/3/2014 Zimran Samuel contributes to BHRC report on human rights inquiry into Violence Against Woman and Girls 

12/3/14 Kerry Smith Returns from maternity leave 5th May

11/3/14 Garden Court North Sponsor Legal Justice Together: Call for Action Conference

03/3/14 Scott v Pacific Mortgages and Others in Supreme Court

28/2/14 Tom Royston on Bedroom Tax: Update and Winning Bedroom Tax Cases

20/2/14 Police Call Handler Unanimously Acquitted of Misconduct in Public Office

02/01/2014 Criminal Barristers National Protest

19/12/2013 Breach of PSED in the provision of women’s approved premises  

18/12/2013 GCN Chambers welcomes vote of no confidence in Law Society leadership in Legal Aid fight 

12/12/13  Richard Brigden acting for anti drilling protesters  

3/12/2013 MoJ VHCC list clarification 

28/11/2013 David Campion - Judgment in EAT case on employment status of a CoE priest handed down

21/11/13 Matthew Stanbury- Divisional Court reiterate that there is no power to lay an information outside the six-month time-limit

19/11/13 Phillip McLeish - Judgment in Leicester City Council v Shearer