News / M1 widening protest prosecution dismissed at Sheffield Cr...


M1 widening protest prosecution dismissed at Sheffield Crown Court  

30/04/2008

A prosecution for conspiracy to commit a public nuisance brought against seven protesters was dismissed at Sheffield Crown Court today. (R v White & Others, Sheffield Crown Court, 30th April 2008).

The defendants were stopped by police on a public highway near the site of road works being carried out to widen the M1 between junction 31 and 32 in South Yorkshire on 16th April last year. Following a search of their vehicle the police recovered three anti road-widening banners and three bicycle D locks. The prosecution case was that the defendants had agreed to suspend the banners from a motorway bridge and/or to lock themselves onto machinery, and that the effect of such a protest would have been to endanger the safety of road users or to necessitate closure of the M1. No such protest had in fact taken place.

Granting a defence application to dismiss the charge, HHJ Robinson found that in order to obtain a conviction the prosecution would have had to prove that the defendants had agreed to do something which would either endanger life or prevent the public from using the M1. He rejected the prosecution argument that the display of banners on a motorway bridge or persons locking themselves on to machinery could endanger life by distracting drivers, and noted that although there was evidence that the closure of the M1 might be considered by the police if a ‘locking-on’ protest were to take place, this would be as a result of police intervention rather than a direct consequence of the ‘lock-on’.

In any event, since the defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit a public nuisance, the prosecution had to prove that the defendants either intended or knew that either danger to life or the closure of the M1 would be the consequence of the action they agreed upon. The judge ruled that even if the prosecution could establish that there was an agreement for the defendants to display banners or lock themselves onto machinery, there was ‘not a jot of evidence’ to suggest that they intended or knew that their actions would cause either danger to life or the closure of the motorway. On the evidence ‘it would involve unacceptable speculation’ to conclude that the defendants intended anything other than ‘a peaceful protest at ground level’.

As a result of the ruling all the defendants were discharged.

The defendants Brereton, Clements and Minns were represented by Mark George , Andy Fitzpatrick and Kate Stone , instructed by Kieran Clarke solicitors, Chesterfield and the defendant Chiat was represented by Pete Weatherby instructed by Bindmans solicitors , London.

Commentary by Kate Stone

Quick links

> 1/5/08 - M1 protest plot case is dropped (Sheffield Telegraph / The Star)



Right menu

  What's New?  
 

#Iamforjustice/ #saveukjustice

LASPO resources
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 Part 3 (re: crime)
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 for Housing Law
Quick Guide to LASPO 2012 for Immigration Law

Now on Twitter @gcnchambers  

*** We are moving: Contacting the clerks on 3.10.14  ***

26.9.14 Legal Aid, Labour and a 'manifesto for hope' (Justice Gap)

GCN to speak at Criminal Law Friendly Society North Conference 17.10.14 (7CPD)

Unlawful eviction seminar | Manchester 15.10.14 3CPD

Immigration update seminar | Manchester 23.10.14 3CPD

10/9/14 Mark George QC to chair international seminar on Judicial Recusal

10/9/14 Mikhil Karnik joins GCN immigration team

28/8/14 Supreme Court challenge to Cat A prisoner's refusal of oral hearing

28/8/14 No Mad Laws Campaign

13/8/14 3-judge Upper Tribunal panel critical of LAA failure to grant Legal Aid  

12/8/14 Rights without remedies: ECtHR ruling on prisoners votes

1/8/14 Clare Ashcroft on BBC Radio4 Woman's Hour

31/7/14 Murder conviction quashed at re-trial

30/7/14 Unlawful council tax reduction scheme judgment - implications for many low income council tax payers

29/7/14 Hilllsborough: latest

22/7/14 Unlawful killing verdict in toddler inquest

21/7/14 "Bricks and mortar" interim accommodation

16/7/14 CART-type JR permission granted

16/7/14 Lucy Mair on Litigants in Person following legal aid cuts

10/7/14 Zimran Samuel expert evidence in Pakistan CG case

9/6/14 Vijay Jagadesham on students and veracity checks

19/5/14 Supreme Court hears IPP Article 5 challenge

24/4/14 GCN's Lucy Mair shortlisted for LALY award