Advocacy: How to handle a vulnerable witness  

Extracts from the article as follows:

What problems most concerned practitioners? Grahame observes that issues such as “the possible ‘ticketing’ of specialist advocates was broadly supported but practicalities such as funding for training and restricted access to representation caused concerns.” Other practical problems of concern involved the “problems of travel, tiredness and concentration for young defendants”.

What were the most important recommendations for practitioners to deal with some of the problems raised in the report? Grahame says that “compulsory training for advocates together with the use of the ‘Toolkit’ included in the report, a duty of disclosure going beyond the legal minimum in cases involving vulnerable witnesses, and the drafting of an ‘Agreed Practice Note’ for the jury setting out details of the difficulties likely to be encountered during questioning” are the key recommendations.

...

However, Grahame points out that “extended disclosure will require more detailed guidelines.”

“The Agreed Practice Note may sound innocuous but is likely to raise significant problems in practice, where agreement between the parties as to the nature and extent of defendant’s or witness’ difficulties will often be contentious and may require assistance such as multiple psychiatric assessments; no mention is made of where funding could be provided for such necessary assistance.”

Quick links

18/4/11 - Guidance published on the handling of vulnerable witnesses, victims and defendants in court - review by Nina Grahame of the report "Raising the Bar" (published April 2011 by the Advocacy Training Council).